Is Roshen Yummi Gummi Twists Halal? Gelatine Confirmed, No Label (2026)

You’ve found Roshen’s Yummi Gummi Twists — fruit-flavoured jelly sticks with a bubblegum filling. Roshen does make explicitly halal-labelled products. This isn’t one of them.

The direct verdict: avoid. Yummi Gummi Twists contain gelatine with no disclosed source and carry no halal or kosher label anywhere.

What’s in the Twists

Sugar, glucose-fructose syrup, wheat flour, sorbitol syrup, non-hydrogenated palm oil, shellac glazing agent, glucose, citric acid, wheat starch, mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, soy lecithin, gelatin, flavourings, colourants (anthocyanin, paprika extract, curcumin, E133).

Two ingredients matter here. Gelatine is confirmed present — this is a jelly candy, and the gel-set texture comes from it, no ambiguity there. What’s not disclosed is the species: Roshen is a conventional Ukrainian manufacturer with no halal certification on this product line, and Eastern European gummy candy manufacturing defaults to pork gelatine unless a product is specifically formulated and labelled otherwise. E471 (mono- and diglycerides) is the second flag — plant or animal source, undisclosed either way.

The glaze itself — shellac (a resin secreted by the lac insect) — is a separate minor point some scholars flag, though it’s a coating, not a bulk ingredient, and considered a lesser concern than the gelatine question.

This Matches Roshen’s Own Pattern

Roshen isn’t a brand you can judge in one sweep — the brand overview covers this in detail. The short version: Roshen explicitly labels its Dark Chocolate 80% and Crabs Caramel “Halal & Kosher” for the US export market, because those products have simple, naturally clean ingredient lists (cocoa, sugar, condensed milk — no gelatine involved). Everything else in the Roshen catalogue, including jellied and gummy sweets, carries no such label.

Yummi Gummi Twists fall squarely into the “no label, gelatine-based, avoid” category the brand page already establishes. This isn’t a new or surprising finding — it’s the expected outcome once you check a specific unlabelled Roshen product against the rule.

Halal Alternatives

• Roshen’s own labelled range — Dark Chocolate 80% Cocoa and Crabs Caramel Candy, both explicitly Halal & Kosher labelled
• Pectin- or agar-based gummy candy — gelatine-free by formulation, sidesteps the sourcing question
• Halal-certified gummy sweets — look for an HMC, HFA, or equivalent logo directly on pack

As an Amazon Associate, HalalCodeCheck earns from qualifying purchases.

Summary

Question	Answer
Is Yummi Gummi Twists halal?	No — avoid
Does it contain gelatine?	Yes, confirmed, source undisclosed
Does Roshen make halal products?	Yes — Dark Chocolate 80% and Crabs Caramel are labelled Halal & Kosher
Is Yummi Gummi Twists one of them?	No
Best halal alternative	Roshen’s labelled range, or pectin-based gummy sweets

Look up gelatine and every other additive in the E-codes database.

To scan a full ingredient list for halal status in seconds, use the ingredient scanner.

How we reached this verdict

We checked the following Tier-1 sources before publishing this verdict:

• Halal certification bodies: No SANHA, HMC, HFA, JAKIM, or MUI listing exists for Yummi Gummi Twists. A third-party halal-product-safety database (Mustakshif) independently flags a related Roshen “Jelly Yummi Gummi” product as not halal, consistent with this finding.
• Manufacturer statements: Roshen’s own product page and multiple independent retailer ingredient listings confirm gelatine’s presence; none disclose its species.
• Sunni fatwa scholarship across the four madhabs:
  • Hanafi-leaning bodies: IslamQA Hanafi, Darul Iftaa Birmingham, AskImam.org, Daruliftaa.com (Mufti Taqi Usmani), Wifaqul Ulama, Darul Iftaa New York.
  • Shafi’i / Maliki-leaning bodies: NU (Nahdlatul Ulama, Indonesia), Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyyah (Egypt), e-fatwa.com (UAE), al-Azhar.
  • Hanbali / Saudi-Salafi-leaning bodies: Saudi Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research, IslamQA Saudi.

Madhab note

The four Sunni madhabs broadly converge on the rules applied in this guide:

• Unlabelled or unspecified gelatine source — treated as a red flag requiring verification across all four madhabs; the cautious default in the absence of certification is to assume porcine origin, especially from a manufacturer with no halal program covering the product in question.
• Pork-derived gelatine — Haram across all four madhabs, with no exception for processing or dilution.
• Insect-derived glazing agents (shellac, E904) — Hanafi, Shafi’i, and Hanbali scholars generally treat insect derivatives as a lesser concern than mammalian haram sources when used as a thin surface coating rather than a bulk ingredient; some Maliki scholars are more permissive of insect-derived substances generally.

If your madhab differs on a specific ruling, the relevant section above flags the school-specific position. For binding rulings on borderline products, consult a competent scholar in your tradition.